Thus Feng called police to document their ex missing out on, to let them understand the ID was completely wrong.
As court provides read, the opening 53 mere seconds on the movie portray another Asian man also likely and fastened on Magnotta’s bed, where the criminal activity allegedly were held. Lin looks later on in videos, for ten minutes.
Subsequently Leclair began his cross-examination of Feng — flown in from China to testify, wearing a traditional grey match, looking just like the 35-year-old expert that he is — launching with a bewildering, preemptive apology.
“I want to offer my personal sympathies to you for your loss in the friend. I believe bad for your buddy. Hence that isn’t regarding the friend. The test is approximately the state of brain of Mr. Magnotta.”
This may be turned exactly about Jun Lin.
“we can’t believe I’m hearing this,” objected Bouthillier, just who complained that Leclair had been producing a statement in the place of posing concerns.
Astonishingly, it what seemed more like a thinly veiled danger rather a query — the type of quantity authorities investigators regularly pull on suspects when attempting to generate a confession — Leclair said to the observe: “I want to speak to your it’s clear in which I’m heading, that I have countless information regarding (Jun Lin).
“The more you volunteer, the greater i need to confront your.”
Exactly what Feng had testified under direct had been that he and Lin had never ever involved with bondage, that Lin got never ever participated in gay social networking while they comprise collectively, but that he knew Lin have a Grindr profile. To their knowledge, Feng put, the website depicted partially nude men.
“Full front nudity?” asked Leclair.
“Impossible. Just semi-nude.”
Feng said he’d followed Lin toward Montreal gay club, the heavens Barr, on only one celebration. He reported to know nothing about men, “Emile,” Lin had presumably found here, with whom he’d afterwards communicated via Skype, just times after Feng leftover for China, and this they’d had intercourse.
“Does that shock you?” Leclair expected.
Feng: “We had split-up in those days already, so he had all his liberty.”
Leclair continuing: “I’m telling your that there’s many things you did perhaps not understand Lin Jun.”
Jury aside. Jury in.
Feng afterwards mentioned he previously no remember of Lin posting an image of himself on Valentine’s time in 2012, with purple hair and damaged teeth underneath the concept “My home Portrait”, though Lin might have done so.
Leclair also implied that Jun Lin, a Concordia college beginner working part time as a store clerk, is one thing of a kept man. Feng compensated the book and provided Lin funds often for meals, the observe conformed.
Feng decided not to deny telling authorities, in a 2012 meeting, about Lin: “he is able to hook-up with total strangers.”
But this, Feng pressured, is an observation made about his ex-lover after they’d split up. When along, the guy insisted their own partnership ended up being monogamous.
After noting some of the porn films that Lin downloaded, Leclair place the concern bluntly toward experience: “Did the guy have any interest in S & M (sado-masochism)?”
“During the time I became with him, he failed to reveal any curiosity about this whatsoever,” Feng responded.
Leclair started showing Feng visual stills from 1 of the movies, severe delights – Feng ended up being certainly unhappy utilizing the images presented, imploring the assess: “Do i need to examine these images?”
Leclair place the question once more. “Are your swearing under oath which he never mentioned to you about anything to perform with S & M?”
Feng: “I concur that.”
At 5 p.m., the observe had been done here, lined up for a journey the home of Beijing Thursday.
A man who’d cherished one and stayed genuine to their storage according to the terrible glare of a pitiless murder trial.